Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China


  • 1.

    Griggs, D. et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495, 305–307 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Databases (FAO, 2020).

  • 3.

    Bai, Z. et al. China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci. Adv. 4, r8534 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Oenema, O. Nitrogen budgets and losses in livestock systems. Int. Congr. Ser. 1293, 262–271 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Sutton, M. A. et al. Our Nutrient World: The Challenge to Produce More Food and Energy with Less Pollution (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2013).

  • 6.

    van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Reducing external costs of nitrogen pollution by relocation of pig production between regions in the European Union. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 2403–2415 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Sutton, M. A. et al. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161 (2011).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Gu, B., Zhang, X., Bai, X., Fu, B. & Chen, D. Four steps to food security for swelling cities. Nature 566, 31–33 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Zhang, C. et al. Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resour. Conserv Recycl. 144, 65–73 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Gu, B., Ju, X., Chang, S. X., Ge, Y. & Chang, J. Nitrogen use efficiencies in Chinese agricultural systems and implications for food security and environmental protection. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1217–1227 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Gu, B., Ju, X., Chang, J., Ge, Y. & Vitousek, P. M. Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8792–8797 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Ma, L. et al. Exploring future food provision scenarios for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1385–1393 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Wu, Y. et al. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7010–7015 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Ju, X., Gu, B., Wu, Y. & Galloway, J. N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 26–32 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Fan, L. et al. Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 464–472 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Naylor, R. Losing the links between livestock and land. Science 310, 1621–1622 (2005).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Willems, J. et al. Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs. Agric. Syst. 144, 122–132 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Garnier, J. et al. Reconnecting crop and cattle farming to reduce nitrogen losses to river water of an intensive agricultural catchment (Seine basin, France): past, present and future. Environ. Sci. Policy 63, 76–90 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    National Data (National Bureau of China, 2019).

  • 20.

    Bai, X., Shi, P. & Liu, Y. Society: realizing China’s urban dream. Nature 509, 158–160 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Zheng, C., Liu, Y., Bluemling, B., Mol, A. P. J. & Chen, J. Environmental potentials of policy instruments to mitigate nutrient emissions in Chinese livestock production. Sci. Total Environ. 502, 149–156 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Bai, Z. et al. China’s pig relocation in balance. Nat. Sustain. 2, 888 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Costs and benefits of nitrogen for Europe and implications for mitigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3571–3579 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Oenema, O. et al. in The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives (eds M. A. Sutton et al.) 62–81 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

  • 27.

    The Technical Guidelines for Measuring the Bearing Capacity of Soil Contaminated by Livestock and Poultry Manure (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2018).

  • 28.

    Gu, B. et al. Toward a generic analytical framework for sustainable nitrogen management: application for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1109–1118 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *