New insights and best practices for the successful use of Empirical Mode Decomposition, Iterative Filtering and derived algorithms


  • 1.

    Bracewell, R. . N. & Bracewell, R. . N. The Fourier transform and its applications Vol. 31999 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Cicone, A. Nonstationary signal decomposition for dummies. in Advances in Mathematical Methods and High Performance Computing 69–82 (Springer, New York, 2019).

  • 3.

    Cohen, L. Time-frequency analysis Vol. 778 (Prentice hall, New York, 1995).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Daubechies, I., Lu, J. & Wu, H. T. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 30, 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002 (2011).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Auger, F. et al. Time-frequency reassignment and synchrosqueezing: An overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 30, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.2265316 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Daubechies, I., Wang, Y. & Wu, H. T. Conceft: Concentration of frequency and time via a multitapered synchrosqueezed transform. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 20150193. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0193 (2016).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Huang, N. E. et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454, 903–995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 (1998).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Flandrin, P. Time-frequency/time-scale analysis Vol. 10 (Academic press, London, 1998).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Huang, N. E. Introduction to the Hilbert-Huang transform and its related mathematical problems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Wu, Z. & Huang, N. E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 1, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    ur Rehman, N., Park, C., Huang, N. . E. & Mandic, D. . P. Emd via memd: multivariate noise-aided computation of standard emd. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 5, 1350007 (2013).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Yeh, J. R., Shieh, J. S. & Huang, N. E. Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A novel noise enhanced data analysis method. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 2, 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000422 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Torres, M. E., Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G. & Flandrin, P. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. in 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 4144–4147, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265 (IEEE, New York, 2011).

  • 14.

    Zheng, J., Cheng, J. & Yang, Y. Partly ensemble empirical mode decomposition: An improved noise-assisted method for eliminating mode mixing. Signal Process. 96, 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.09.013 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Ur Rehman, N. & Mandic, D. . P. Filter bank property of multivariate empirical mode decomposition. IIEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59, 2421–2426 (2011).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Lang, X. et al. Fast multivariate empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Access 6, 65521–65538. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877150 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Lin, L., Wang, Y. & Zhou, H. Iterative filtering as an alternative algorithm for empirical mode decomposition. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 1, 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179353690900028X (2009).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Cicone, A. & Zhou, H. Numerical analysis for iterative filtering with new efficient implementations based on fft. Numer. Math. (2020).

  • 19.

    Huang, C., Yang, L. & Wang, Y. Convergence of a convolution-filtering-based algorithm for empirical mode decomposition. Adv. Adapt. Data Anal. 1, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000205 (2009).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Wang, Y. & Zhou, Z. On the convergence of iterative filtering empirical mode decomposition. Excursions Harmonic Anal. 2, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8379-5_8 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2013).

  • 21.

    Cicone, A. & Dell’Acqua, P. Study of boundary conditions in the iterative filtering method for the decomposition of nonstationary signals. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 373, 112248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.04.028 (2020).

  • 22.

    Cicone, A., Garoni, C. & Serra-Capizzano, S. Spectral and convergence analysis of the discrete alif method. Linear Algebra Appl. 580, 62–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2019.06.021 (2019).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Cicone, A. Iterative filtering as a direct method for the decomposition of nonstationary signals. Numer. Algorithms, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-019-00838-z (2020).

  • 24.

    Cicone, A. & Zhou, H. One or two frequencies? the iterative filtering answers. Preprint (2020).

  • 25.

    Cicone, A., Liu, J. & Zhou, H. Adaptive local iterative filtering for signal decomposition and instantaneous frequency analysis. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 41, 384–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2016.03.001 (2016).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Cicone, A. & Wu, H.-T. Convergence analysis of adaptive locally iterative filtering and sift method. Submitted (2020).

  • 27.

    Cicone, A. & Zhou, H. Multidimensional iterative filtering method for the decomposition of high-dimensional non-stationary signals. Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 10, 278–298. https://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.2017.s05 (2017).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Papini, E. et al. Multidimensional iterative filtering: a new approach for investigating plasma turbulence in numerical simulations. J. Plasma Phys. (2020).

  • 29.

    Cicone, A. Multivariate fast iterative filtering for the decomposition of nonstationary signals. Preprint (2020).

  • 30.

    Huang, N. E. & Wu, Z. A review on hilbert-huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev. Geophys. 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228 (2008).

  • 31.

    Bowman, D. C. & Lees, J. M. The Hilbert-Huang transform: A high resolution spectral method for nonlinear and nonstationary time series. Seismol. Res. Lett. 84, 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130025 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Tary, J. B., Herrera, R. H., Han, J. & van der Baan, M. Spectral estimation–what is new? what is next?. Rev. Geophys. 52, 723–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000461 (2014).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Baykut, S., Akgül, T., İnan, S. & Seyis, C. Observation and removal of daily quasi-periodic components in soil radon data. Radiat. Meas. 45, 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.04.002 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Tsolis, G. S. & Xenos, T. D. A qualitative study of the seismo-ionospheric precursors prior to the 6 April 2009 earthquake in l’aquila, Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 133–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-133-2010 (2010).

  • 35.

    Huang, J. Y. et al. Coseismic deformation time history calculated from acceleration records using an emd-derived baseline correction scheme: A new approach validated for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103, 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120278 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Chen, C. H. et al. Surface deformation and seismic rebound: implications and applications. Surv. Geophys. 32, 291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-011-9117-3 (2011).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Barman, C., Ghose, D., Sinha, B. & Deb, A. Detection of earthquake induced radon precursors by Hilbert Huang transform. J. Appl. Geophys. 133, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.08.004 (2016).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Wang, D., Hwang, C. & Shen, W. Investigations of anomalous gravity signals prior to 71 large earthquakes based on a 4-years long superconducting gravimeter records. Geodesy Geodyn. 8, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.07.002 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Chen, C. et al. Identification of earthquake signals from groundwater level records using the hht method. Geophys. J. Int. 180, 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04473.x (2010).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Battista, B. M., Knapp, C., McGee, T. & Goebel, V. Application of the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert-Huang transform to seismic reflection data. Geophysics 72, H29–H37. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2437700 (2007).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Chen, Y. Dip-separated structural filtering using seislet transform and adaptive empirical mode decomposition based dip filter. Geophys. J. Int. 206, 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw165 (2016).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Vasudevan, K. & Cook, F. A. Empirical mode skeletonization of deep crustal seismic data: Theory and applications. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 105, 7845–7856. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900445 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Roberts, P. H., Yu, Z. J. & Russell, C. T. On the 60-year signal from the core. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 101, 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091920601083820 (2007).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Jackson, L. P. & Mound, J. E. Geomagnetic variation on decadal time scales: What can we learn from empirical mode decomposition?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043455 (2010).

  • 45.

    Yu, Z. G., Anh, V., Wang, Y., Mao, D. & Wanliss, J. Modeling and simulation of the horizontal component of the geomagnetic field by fractional stochastic differential equations in conjunction with empirical mode decomposition. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA015206 (2010).

  • 46.

    Materassi, M. et al. Stepping into the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval: preliminary results of multi scale statistical analysis. Ann. Geophys. 61, 55. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7801 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Spogli, L. et al. Role of the external drivers in the occurrence of low-latitude ionospheric scintillation revealed by multi-scale analysis. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 9, A35, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2019032 (2019).

  • 48.

    Piersanti, M. et al. Adaptive local iterative filtering: A promising technique for the analysis of nonstationary signals. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 123, 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024153 (2018).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Spogli, L. et al. Role of the external drivers in the occurrence of low-latitude ionospheric scintillation revealed by multi-scale analysis. 2019 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference, AP-RASC 2019, 8738254 (2019).

  • 50.

    Huang, N. E. et al. A new spectral representation of earthquake data: Hilbert spectral analysis of station tcu129, Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 21 September 1999. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 1310–1338. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000735 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Loh, C. H., Wu, T. C. & Huang, N. E. Application of the empirical mode decomposition-Hilbert spectrum method to identify near-fault ground-motion characteristics and structural responses. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 1339–1357. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000715 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Zhang, R. R., Ma, S., Safak, E. & Hartzell, S. Hilbert-Huang transform analysis of dynamic and earthquake motion recordings. J. Eng. Mech. 129, 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(861) (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Zhang, R. R., Ma, S. & Hartzell, S. Signatures of the seismic source in emd-based characterization of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake recordings. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010285 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Yang, J. N., Lei, Y., Lin, S. & Huang, N. Identification of natural frequencies and dampings of in situ tall buildings using ambient wind vibration data. J. Eng. Mech. 130, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:5(570) (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Franzke, C. Multi-scale analysis of teleconnection indices: Climate noise and nonlinear trend analysis. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 16, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-65-2009 (2009).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Lee, T. & Ouarda, T. B. M. J. Prediction of climate nonstationary oscillation processes with empirical mode decomposition. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015142 (2011).

  • 57.

    Ezer, T. & Corlett, W. B. Is sea level rise accelerating in the Chesapeake Bay? A demonstration of a novel new approach for analyzing sea level data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053435 (2012).

  • 58.

    Franzke, C. Nonlinear trends, long-range dependence, and climate noise properties of surface temperature. J. Clim. 25, 4172–4183. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00293.1 (2012).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Ezer, T., Atkinson, L. . P., Corlett, W. . B. & Blanco, J. . L. Gulf stream’s induced sea level rise and variability along the u.s. mid-atlantic coast.. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20091 (2013).

  • 60.

    Duffy, D. G. The application of hilbert-huang transforms to meteorological datasets. Hilbert-Huang Transform Appl. 203–221, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814508247_0009 (World Scientific, 2014).

  • 61.

    Huang, N. E., Shen, Z. & Long, S. R. A new view of nonlinear water waves: The Hilbert spectrum. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.417 (1999).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Terradas, J., Oliver, R. & Ballester, J. L. Application of statistical techniques to the analysis of solar coronal oscillations. Astrophys. J. 614, 435 (2004).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Morton, R. J., Erdélyi, R., Jess, D. B. & Mathioudakis, M. Observations of sausage modes in magnetic pores. Astrophys. J. Lett. 729, L18. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L18 (2011).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. & Wasle, E. GNSS-global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more (Springer, New York, 2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Ghobadi, H. et al. Disentangling ionospheric refraction and diffraction effects in gnss raw phase through fast iterative filtering technique. GPS Solut. (2020).

  • 66.

    Hillier, A., Morton, R. J. & Erdélyi, R. A statistical study of transverse oscillations in a quiescent prominence. Astrophys. J. Lett. 779, L16. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/779/2/L16 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Wang, C. et al. Deconvolution of subcellular protrusion heterogeneity and the underlying actin regulator dynamics from live cell imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04030-0 (2018).

  • 68.

    Cicone, A., Liu, J. & Zhou, H. Hyperspectral chemical plume detection algorithms based on multidimensional iterative filtering decomposition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 2015.0196, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0196 (2016).

  • 69.

    Yang, A. C., Peng, C. K. & Huang, N. E. Causal decomposition in the mutual causation system. Nat. Commun. 9, 3378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05845-7 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L. & Peng, C. K. Broken asymmetry of the human heartbeat: Loss of time irreversibility in aging and disease. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 198102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.198102 (2005).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Cicone, A. & Wu, H.-T. How nonlinear-type time-frequency analysis can help in sensing instantaneous heart rate and instantaneous respiratory rate from photoplethysmography in a reliable way. Front. Physiol. 8, 701 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Cummings, D. A. et al. Travelling waves in the occurrence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand. Nature 427, 344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02225 (2004).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Liang, H., Bressler, S. L., Buffalo, E. A., Desimone, R. & Fries, P. Empirical mode decomposition of field potentials from macaque v4 in visual spatial attention. Biol. Cybernet. 92, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-005-0566-y (2005).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Yang, A. C., Huang, N. E., Peng, C. K. & Tsai, S. J. Do seasons have an influence on the incidence of depression? The use of an internet search engine query data as a proxy of human affect. PLOS ONE 5, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013728 (2010).

  • 75.

    Wu, C. H. et al. Frequency recognition in an ssvep-based brain computer interface using empirical mode decomposition and refined generalized zero-crossing. J. Neurosci. Methods 196, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.014 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J. & Desimone, R. Cell-type-specific synchronization of neural activity in fef with v4 during attention. Neuron 73, 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.019 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Hu, K., Lo, M. T., Peng, C. K., Liu, Y. & Novak, V. A nonlinear dynamic approach reveals a long-term stroke effect on cerebral blood flow regulation at multiple time scales. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002601 (2012).

    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Zheng, Y., Wang, G., Li, K., Bao, G. & Wang, J. Epileptic seizure prediction using phase synchronization based on bivariate empirical mode decomposition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 1104–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.047 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Hassan, A. R. & Bhuiyan, M. I. H. Automatic sleep scoring using statistical features in the emd domain and ensemble methods. Biocybernet. Biomed. Eng. 36, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2015.11.001 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 80.

    Parey, A., El Badaoui, M., Guillet, F. & Tandon, N. Dynamic modelling of spur gear pair and application of empirical mode decomposition-based statistical analysis for early detection of localized tooth defect. J. Sound Vib. 294, 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.021 (2006).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 81.

    Liu, H., Chen, C., Tian, H. Q. & Li, Y. F. A hybrid model for wind speed prediction using empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural networks. Renewable Energy 48, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.012 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    Wei, Y. & Chen, M. C. Forecasting the short-term metro passenger flow with empirical mode decomposition and neural networks. Transp. Res. Part C-Emerg. Technol. 21, 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.009 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    An, N., Zhao, W., Wang, J., Shang, D. & Zhao, E. Using multi-output feedforward neural network with empirical mode decomposition based signal filtering for electricity demand forecasting. Energy 49, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.035 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Sfarra, S. et al. Improving the detection of thermal bridges in buildings via on-site infrared thermography: The potentialities of innovative mathematical tools. Energy and Build. 182, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.017 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 85.

    Lei, Y., Lin, J., He, Z. & Zuo, M. J. A review on empirical mode decomposition in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 35, 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.09.015 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Yu, L., Wang, S. & Lai, K. K. Forecasting crude oil price with an emd-based neural network ensemble learning paradigm. Energy Econ. 30, 2623–2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.05.003 (2008).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 87.

    Zhang, X., Lai, K. K. & Wang, S. Y. A new approach for crude oil price analysis based on empirical mode decomposition. Energy Econ. 30, 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.02.012 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Zhang, X., Yu, L., Wang, S. & Lai, K. K. Estimating the impact of extreme events on crude oil price: An emd-based event analysis method. Energy Econ. 31, 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.003 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    Abdelouahad, A. A., El Hassouni, M., Cherifi, H. & Aboutajdine, D. Reduced reference image quality assessment based on statistics in empirical mode decomposition domain. Signal Image Video Process. 8, 1663–1680 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 90.

    Xia, Y., Zhang, B., Pei, W. & Mandic, D. P. Bidimensional multivariate empirical mode decomposition with applications in multi-scale image fusion. IEEE Access 7, 114261–114270 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 91.

    Li, X., Su, J. & Yang, L. Building detection in sar images based on bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition algorithm. in IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (2019).

  • 92.

    Rato, R. T., Ortigueira, M. D. & Batista, A. G. On the hht, its problems, and some solutions. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22, 1374–1394 (2008).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 93.

    Huang, N. E. Empirical mode decomposition apparatus, method and article of manufacture for analyzing biological signals and performing curve fitting (2004). US Patent 6738734.

  • 94.

    Huang, N. E. et al. A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and hilbert spectral analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 459, 2317–2345 (2003).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 95.

    Dätig, M. & Schlurmann, T. Performance and limitations of the hilbert-huang transformation (hht) with an application to irregular water waves. Ocean Eng. 31, 1783–1834 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 96.

    Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., Goncalves, P. et al. On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In IEEE-EURASIP workshop on nonlinear signal and image processing, Vol. 3, 8–11 (NSIP-03, Grado (I), 2003).

  • 97.

    Liu, Z. A novel boundary extension approach for empirical mode decomposition. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing, 299–304 (Springer, New York, 2006).

  • 98.

    Wang, J., Liu, W. & Zhang, S. An approach to eliminating end effects of emd through mirror extension coupled with support vector machine method. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 23, 443–452 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 99.

    Meng, E. et al. A robust method for non-stationary streamflow prediction based on improved emd-svm model. J. Hydrol. 568, 462–478 (2019).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 100.

    Stallone, A., Cicone, A. & Materassi, M. New insights and best practices for the successful use of empirical mode decomposition, iterative filtering and derived algorithms. Supplementary material. Sci. Rep. (2020).

  • 101.

    Briongos, J. V., Aragón, J. M. & Palancar, M. C. Phase space structure and multi-resolution analysis of gas-solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics: Part I–the emd approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 6963–6980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.023 (2006).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 102.

    Sweeney-Reed, C. M. & Nasuto, S. J. A novel approach to the detection of synchronisation in eeg based on empirical mode decomposition. J. Comput. Neurosci. 23, 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0020-3 (2007).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 103.

    Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Mintzelas, A. & Papadopoulou, K. A. Micro-scale, mid-scale, and macro-scale in global seismicity identified by empirical mode decomposition and their multifractal characteristics. Sci. Rep. 8, 9206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27567-y (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 104.

    Yun, S. M. et al. Analyzing groundwater level anomalies in a fault zone in Korea caused by local and offshore earthquakes. Geosci. J. 23, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-018-0062-8 (2019).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 105.

    Dziewonski, A. M., Chou, T. A. & Woodhouse, J. H. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 86, 2825–2852. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB04p02825 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 106.

    Ekström, G., Nettles, M. & Dziewoński, A. M. The global cmt project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 200, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002 (2012).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 107.

    Materassi, M. & Mitchell, C. Wavelet analysis of gps amplitude scintillation: A case study. Radio Sci. 42 (2007).

  • 108.

    Alberti, T. et al. Time scale separation in the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling during st. patrick’s day storms in 2013 and 2015. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 4266–4283. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023175 (2017).

  • 109.

    Pan, N., Mang, V. & Un, M. P. Accurate removal of baseline wander in ecg using empirical mode decomposition. in 2007 Joint Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the International Conference on Functional Biomedical Imaging, 177–180 (IEEE, 2007).

  • 110.

    Chen, H. J., Chen, C. C., Tseng, C. Y. & Wang, J. H. Effect of tidal triggering on seismicity in Taiwan revealed by the empirical mode decomposition method. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 12, 2193. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2193-2012 (2012).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 111.

    Matcharashvili, T., Telesca, L., Chelidze, T., Javakhishvili, Z. & Zhukova, N. Analysis of temporal variation of earthquake occurrences in caucasus from 1960 to 2011. Tectonophysics 608, 857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.07.033 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 112.

    Fan, X. & Lin, M. Multiscale multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of earthquake magnitude series of Southern California. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 479, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.03.003 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 113.

    Nenadic, Z. & Burdick, J. W. Spike detection using the continuous wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52, 74–87 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 114.

    Yang, H.-W. et al. A minimum arclength method for removing spikes in empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Access 7, 13284–13294 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 115.

    Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S. & Chakravarthy, S. R. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. in Upwind and high-resolution schemes, 218–290 (Springer, 1987).

  • 116.

    Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429–484 (1991).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 117.

    Macek, W. M. & Wawrzaszek, A. Multifractal turbulence at the termination shock. in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1216, 572–575 (American Institute of Physics, 2010).

  • 118.

    Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429–484 (1991).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 119.

    Frisch, U. & Kolmogorov, A. N. Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 120.

    Materassi, M., Wernik, A. W. & Yordanova, E. Statistics in the p-model. Chaos Solit. Fractals 30, 642–655 (2006).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 121.

    Marsch, E. & Tu, C.-Y. Intermittency, non-Gaussian statistics and fractal scaling of mhd fluctuations in the solar wind. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 4, 101–124 (1997).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 122.

    Macek, W. M. Multifractality and intermittency in the solar wind. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 14, 695–700 (2007).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 123.

    Grzesiak, M. Analysis of random cascade processes in the earth magnetospheric cusps. Acta Geophys. Polon. 48, 241–261 (2000).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 124.

    Muzy, J.-F., Bacry, E. & Arneodo, A. The multifractal formalism revisited with wavelets. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 4, 245–302 (1994).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 125.

    Macek, W. M. & Wawrzaszek, A. Multifractal two-scale cantor set model for slow solar wind turbulence in the outer heliosphere during solar maximum. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18, 287 (2011).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 126.

    Farge, M. Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 395–458 (1992).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 127.

    González, A. O., Junior, O. M., Menconi, V. E. & Domingues, M. O. Daubechies wavelet coefficients: a tool to study interplanetary magnetic field fluctuations. Geofís. Int. 53, 101–115 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 128.

    Kampers, G. et al. Disentangling stochastic signals superposed on short localized oscillations. Phys. Lett. A 384, 126307 (2020).

    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *