Patenting and business outcomes for cleantech startups funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy


  • 1.

    America COMPETES Act (110th US Congress, 2007).

  • 2.

    Anadón, L. D., Chan, G. A., Bin-nun, A. Y. & Narayanamurti, V. The pressing energy innovation challenge of the US National Laboratories. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.117 (2016).

  • 3.

    Goldstein, A. P. & Narayanamurti, V. Simultaneous pursuit of discovery and invention in the US department of energy. Res. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.005 (2018).

  • 4.

    Anadón, L. D., Bunn, M. & Narayanamurti, V. Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 5.

    Accelerating the Pace of Change in Energy Technologies Through an Integrated Federal Energy Policy (President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), 2010).

  • 6.

    A Business Plan for America’s Energy Future (American Energy Innovation Council, 2010).

  • 7.

    Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G. & Stavins, R. N. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 54, 164–174 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Kattel, R. & Mazzucato, M. Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Ind. Corp. Chang. 27, 787–801 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Mazzucato, M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Anthem Press, 2013).

  • 10.

    Arrow, K. in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors 609–626 (Princeton University Press, 1962).

  • 11.

    Nelson, R. R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Polit. Econ. 67, 297–306 (1959).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R. & Rhodes-Kropf, M. Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 25–48 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Hall, R. E. & Woodward, S. E. The burden of the nondiversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 1163–1194 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Nanda, R. & Rhodes-Kropf, M. Financing risk and innovation. Manag. Sci. 63, 901–918 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again (US Office of Management and Budget, 2017).

  • 16.

    Bronzini, R. & Piselli, P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Res. Policy 45, 442–457 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Aerts, K. & Schmidt, T. S. Two for the price of one?: additionality effects of R&D subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany. Res. Policy 37, 806–822 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    González, X. & Pazó, C. Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Res. Policy 37, 371–389 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Hussinger, K. R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. J. Appl. Econom. 23, 729–747 (2008).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Deleidi, M., Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Neither crowding in nor out: public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects. Energy Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111195 (2019).

  • 21.

    Doblinger, C., Surana, K. & Anadón, L. D. Governments as partners: the role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation. Res. Policy 48, 1458–1475 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Howell, S. T. Financing innovation: evidence from R&D grants. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 1136–1164 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Pless, J. Are“Complementary Policies” Substitutes? Evidence from R&D Subsidies in the UK (Jacquelyn Pless, 2018); http://jacquelynpless.com/research/

  • 24.

    Azoulay, P., Fuchs, E. R. H., Goldstein, A. P. & Kearney, M. Funding breakthrough research: promises and challenges of the ‘ARPA Model’. Innov. Policy Econ. 19, 69–96 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Fuchs, E. R. H. Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Res. Policy 39, 1133–1147 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Stokstad, E. UK cues up big funding increases for R&D. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6928 (2020).

  • 27.

    Bonvillian, W. B. DARPA and its ARPA-E and IARPA clones: a unique innovation organization model. Ind. Corp. Chang. 27, 897–914 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Chan, G. A., Goldstein, A. P., Bin-Nun, A., Anadón, L. D. & Narayanamurti, V. Six principles for energy innovation. Nature 552, 25–27 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Pless, J., Hepburn, C. & Farrell, N. Bringing rigour to energy innovation policy evaluation. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0557-1 (2020).

  • 30.

    Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C. & Lehmann, E. E. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).

  • 31.

    Bettis, R. A. & Hitt, M. A. The new competitive landscape. Strateg. Manag. J. 16, 7–19 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Hockerts, K. & Wüstenhagen, R. Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 25, 481–492 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Dushnitsky, G. & Lenox, M. J. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34, 615–639 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Markard, J. & Truffer, B. Innovation processes in large technical systems: market liberalization as a driver for radical change? Res. Policy 35, 609–625 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Doblinger, C. & Soppe, B. Change-actors in the U.S. electric energy system: the role of environmental groups in utility adoption and diffusion of wind power. Energy Policy 61, 274–284 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Popp, D., Pless, J., Hascic, I. & Johnstone, N. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector NBER Working Paper No. 27145 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).

  • 37.

    Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B. & Wayman, L. Venture capital and cleantech: the wrong model for energy innovation. Energy Policy 102, 385–395 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    A Retrospective Assessment of Clean Energy Investments in the Recovery Act (Council of Economic Advisors, 2016).

  • 39.

    An Assessment of ARPA-E (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017).

  • 40.

    Islam, M., Fremeth, A. & Marcus, A. Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. J. Bus. Ventur. 33, 35–51 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Conti, A., Thursby, J. & Thursby, M. Patents as signals for startup financing. J. Ind. Econ. 61, 592–622 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Guzman, J. & Stern, S. Where is silicon valley? Science 347, 606–609 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Iacus, S. M., King, G. & Porro, G. Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106, 345–361 (2011).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Feldman, M. P. & Kelley, M. R. The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Res. Policy 35, 1509–1521 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Conti, A. Entrepreneurial finance and the effects of restrictions on government R & D subsidies. Organ. Sci. 29, 134–153 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Goldstein, A. P. & Kearney, M. Know when to fold ’em: an empirical description of risk management in public research funding. Res. Policy 49, 103873 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    ARPA-E Impacts: A Sampling of Project Outcomes Vol. 3 (ARPA-E, 2018).

  • 48.

    Goldstein, A. P. & Kearney, M. Uncertainty and individual discretion in allocating research funds. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3012169 (2017).

  • 49.

    Azoulay, P. Research efficiency: turn the scientific method on ourselves. Nature 484, 31–32 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Jaffe, A. B. Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 18, 22–34 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Scott, E., Shu, P. & Lubynsky, R. Entrepreneurial uncertainty and expert evaluation: an empirical analysis. Manage. Sci. 66, 1005–1507 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy Could Benefit from Information on Applicants’ Prior Funding (Government Accountability Office, 2012).

  • 53.

    Bumpus, A. & Comello, S. Emerging clean energy technology investment trends. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 382–385 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Nemet, G. F., Zipperer, V. & Kraus, M. The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. Energy Policy 119, 154–167 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Our Coverage (Cleantech Group, 2017).

  • 56.

    Trajtenberg, M. Patents, Citations and Innovations: Tracing the Links (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1987).

  • 57.

    Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J. & Mahajan, A. Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Res. Policy 43, 1164–1176 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. Organizational Ecology (Harvard Univ. Press, 1989).

  • 59.

    Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G. & Porro, G. CEM: coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9, 524–546 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *