The automatic influence of advocacy on lawyers and novices


  • 1.

    Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, 2011).

  • 2.

    Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., Camerer, C. & Babcock, L. Self-serving assessments of fairness and pretrial bargaining. J. Leg. Stud. 22, 135–159 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Plato. (transl. Waterford, R.) Gorgias (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  • 4.

    Deflem, M. Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).

  • 5.

    Perlman, A. M. A behavioral theory of legal ethics. Indiana Law J. 90, 1639–1669 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Kahan, D. M. Laws of cognition and the cognition of law. Cognition 135, 56–60 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Krieger, L. S. Institutional denial about the dark side of law school, and fresh empirical guidance for constructively breaking the silence. J. Leg. Educ. 52 (2002).

  • 8.

    Bargh, J. A. in Handbook of Social Cognition Vol. 1 (eds Wyer, R. S. & Srull, T. K.) 1–40 (Erlbaum, 1994).

  • 9.

    Bargh, J. A. in Unintended Thought (eds Uleman, J. S. & Bargh, J. A.) 3–51 (Guilford, 1989).

  • 10.

    Melnikoff, D. E. & Bargh, J. A. The mythical number two. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 280–293 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychol. Bull. 132, 297–326 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Bem, D. J. Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 74, 183–200 (1967).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, J. M. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 58, 203–210 (1959).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Higgins, E. T. & Rholes, W. S. Saying is believing: effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 14, 363–378 (1978).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Thompson, L. & Loewenstein, G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 51, 176–197 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Thompson, L. “They saw a negotiation”: partisanship and involvement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 839–853 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T. & Schwarzbach, J. Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6275–6280 (2003).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Maniscalco, B., Bang, J. W., Iravani, L., Camps-Febrer, F. & Lau, H. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors? Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 841–851 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Janis, I. L. & Gilmore, J. B. The influence of incentive conditions on the success of role playing in modifying attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1, 17–27 (1965).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Fodor, J. A. The Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, 1983).

  • 21.

    Melnikoff, D. E. & Bailey, A. H. Preferences for moral vs. immoral traits in others are conditional. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E592–E600 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Ratner, K. G., Kaul, C. & Van Bavel, J. J. Is race erased? Decoding race from patterns of neural activity when skin color is not diagnostic of group boundaries. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 750–755 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    De Frietas, J., Cikara, M., Grossman, I. & Schlegel, R. Origins of the belief in good true selves. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 634–636 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Strohminger, N., Knobe, J. & Newman, G. The true self: a psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 551–560 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    De Frietas, J. & Cikara, M. Deep down my enemy is good: thinking about the true self reduces intergroup bias. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 74, 307–316 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    De Frietas, J. et al. Consistent belief in a good true self in misanthropes and three interdependent cultures. Cogn. Sci. 42, 134–160 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Newman, G. E., De Frietas, J. & Knobe, J. Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cogn. Sci. 39, 96–125 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Hogarth, R. Judgment and Choice 2nd edn (Wiley, 1987).

  • 29.

    Kruglanski, A. W. Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases (Plenum, 1989).

  • 30.

    Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing II: perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol. Rev. 84, 127–190 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Newman, G., Bloom, P. & Knobe, J. Value judgments and the true self. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 203–216 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814–834 (2001).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Tetlock, P. E. et al. People as intuitive prosecutors: the impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 195–209 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Baumeister, R. F. & Newman, L. S. Self-regulation of cognitive inference and decision processes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20, 3–19 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Moss, A. J. & Litman, L. After the bot scare: understanding what’s been happening with data collection on MTurk and how to stop it. Cloudprime https://blog.turkprime.com/after-the-bot-scare-understanding-whats-been-happening-with-data-collection-on-mturk-and-how-to-stop-it (2018).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *