CIVIL ENGINEERING 365 ALL ABOUT CIVIL ENGINEERING


  • 1.

    Todd, J. et al. Towards a new model of attentional biases in the development, maintenance, and management of pain. Pain 156, 1589–1600 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Vlaeyen, J. W. & Linton, S. J. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85, 317–332 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., Van Damme, S., Vlaeyen, J. W. S. & Karoly, P. Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation. Clin. J. Pain 28, 475–483 (2012).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Eccleston, C. & Crombez, G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol. Bull. 125, 356–366 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Van Damme, S., Crombez, G. & Eccleston, C. Disengagement from pain: the role of catastrophic thinking about pain. Pain 107, 70–76 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Eccleston, C. & Crombez, G. Worry and chronic pain: a misdirected problem solving model. Pain 132, 233–236 (2007).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Crombez, G., Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Eccleston, C. & Van Damme, S. Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis. Pain 154, 497–510 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Todd, J., van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Sharpe, L. & Crombez, G. Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis of dot-probe studies. Health Psychol. Rev. 12, 419–436 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Noel, M., Sharpe, L., Pincus, T. & Van Damme, S. Cognitive biases in pain: an integrated functional-contextual framework. Pain https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001508 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Dear, B. F., Sharpe, L., Nicholas, M. K. & Refshauge, K. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research. J. Pain 12, 1247–1254 (2011).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Skinner, I. W. et al. The reliability of eyetracking to assess attentional bias to threatening words in healthy individuals. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 1778–1792 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Dear, B. F., Sharpe, L., Nicholas, M. K. & Refshauge, K. Pain-related attentional biases: the importance of the personal relevance and ecological validity of stimuli. J. Pain 12, 625–632 (2011).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Khatibi, A., Dehghani, M., Sharpe, L., Asmundson, G. J. G. & Pouretemad, H. Selective attention towards painful faces among chronic pain patients: evidence from a modified version of the dot-probe. Pain 142, 42–47 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Ceccarini, F. & Caudek, C. Anger superiority effect: The importance of dynamic emotional facial expressions. Vis. cogn. 21, 498–540 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Sarapas, C., Weinberg, A., Langenecker, S. A. & Shankman, S. A. Relationships among attention networks and physiological responding to threat. Brain Cogn. 111, 63–72 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Heathcote, L. C. et al. The relationship between adolescents ’ pain catastrophizing and attention bias to pain faces is moderated by attention control. Pain 156, 1334–1341 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Heathcote, L. C. et al. Child attention to pain and pain tolerance are dependent upon anxiety and attention control: an eye-tracking study. Eur. J. Pain 21, 250–263 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Lau, J. Y. F. et al. Greater response interference to pain faces under low perceptual load conditions in adolescents with impairing pain: a role for poor attention control mechanisms in pain disability?. J. Pain 20, 453–461 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Mazidi, M. et al. Time-course of attentional bias to painful facial expressions and the moderating role of attentional control: an eye-tracking study. Br. J. Pain https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463719866877 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Hutton, S. B. & Ettinger, U. The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. Psychophysiology 43, 302–313 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Magnusdottir, B. B. et al. Cognitive measures and performance on the antisaccade eye movement task. J. Cogn. 2, 3 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Derakshan, N. & Eysenck, M. W. Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance new developments from attentional control theory. Eur. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Sweeney, J. A., Rosano, C., Berman, R. A. & Luna, B. Inhibitory control of attention declines more than working memory during normal aging. Neurobiol. Aging 22, 39–47 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P. & Muhlberger, A. Probing the attentional control theory in social anxiety: an emotional saccade task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 314–322 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L. & Eysenck, M. W. Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness. An investigation using antisaccade task. Exp. Psychol. 56, 48–55 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Dias, N. R. et al. Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects. Behav. Brain Res. 292, 493–499 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L. et al. Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: an antisaccade study. J. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 54–65 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Kim, M. et al. Dysfunctional attentional bias and inhibitory control during anti-saccade task in patients with internet gaming disorder: an eye tracking study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 95, 109717 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    MacLeod, C., Mathews, A. & Tata, P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 95, 15–20 (1986).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Weierich, M. R., Treat, T. A. & Hollingworth, A. Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety. Cogn. Emot. 22, 985–1018 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. & Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol. Assess. 7, 524–532 (1996).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Akbari, F., Dehghani, M., Khatibi, A. & Vervoort, T. Incorporating family function into chronic pain disability: the role of catastrophizing. Pain Res. Manag. 2016, 6838596 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Khatibi, A., Schrooten, M. G., Vancleef, L. M. & Vlaeyen, J. W. An experimental examination of catastrophizing-related interpretation bias for ambiguous facial expressions of pain using an incidental learning task. Front Psychol. 5, 1002 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Derryberry, D. & Reed, M. Anxiety related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 111, 225–236 (2002).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Abasi, I., Mohammadkhani, P., Pourshahbaz, A. & Dolatshahi, B. The psychometric properties of attentional control scale and its relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression: a study on Iranian population. Iran. J. Psychiatry 12, 109–117 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    McNeil, D. W. & Rainwater, A. J. 3rd. Development of the fear of pain questionnaire–III. J. Behav. Med. 21, 389–410 (1998).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Roelofs, J., Peters, M. L., Fassaert, T. & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. The role of fear of movement and injury in selective attentional processing in patients with chronic low back pain: a dot-probe evaluation. J. Pain 6, 294–300 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Mazidi, M., Vig, K., Ranjbar, S., Ebrahimi, M.-R. & Khatibi, A. Attentional bias and its temporal dynamics among war veterans suffering from chronic pain: investigating the contribution of post-traumatic stress symptoms. J. Anxiety Disord. 66, 102115 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. & Jacobs, G. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, 1983).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Beck, A. T., Sreer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II (Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, 1996).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N. & Ebrahimkhani, N. Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second edition: BDI-II-PERSIAN. Depress. Anxiety 21, 185–192 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Roy, S. et al. A dynamic facial expression database. J. Vis. 7, 944 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Simon, D. et al. Recognition and discrimination of prototypical dynamic expressions of pain and emotions. Pain https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.008 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Khatibi, A., Vachon-Presseau, E., Schrooten, M., Vlaeyen, J. & Rainville, P. Attention effects on vicarious modulation of nociception and pain. Pain 155, 2033–2039 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Hallett, P. E. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res. 18, 1279–1296 (1978).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Derakshan, N., Salt, M. & Koster, E. H. W. Attentional control in dysphoria: an investigation using the antisaccade task. Biol. Psychol. 80, 251–255 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Garner, M., Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. Orienting and maintenance of gaze to facial expressions in social anxiety. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115, 760–770 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Myles, O., Grafton, B., Clarke, P. & MacLeod, C. GIVE me your attention: differentiating goal identification and goal execution components of the anti-saccade effect. PLoS ONE 14, e0222710 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Chen, N. T. M., Clarke, P. J. F., Watson, T. L., MacLeod, C. & Guastella, A. J. Biased saccadic responses to emotional stimuli in anxiety: an antisaccade study. PLoS ONE 9, e86474 (2014).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Ansari, T. L., Derakshan, N. & Richards, A. Effects of anxiety on task switching: evidence from the mixed antisaccade task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 229–238 (2008).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Hayes, A. F. & Preacher, K. J. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 67, 451–470 (2014).

    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Hayes, A. F. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76, 408–420 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M. & Edwards, R. R. Pain catastrophizing a critical review. Expert Rev. Neurother. 9, 745–758 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Shi, R., Sharpe, L. & Abbott, M. A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and attentional control. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 72, 101754 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W. & Fox, E. Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2, 378–395 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Crombez, G. & Linton, S. J. The fear-avoidance model of pain. Pain 157, 1588–1589 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Cisler, J. M. & Koster, E. H. W. Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in the anxiety disorders: an integrative review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 203 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Edwards, R., Eccleston, C. & Keogh, E. Observer influences on pain: an experimental series examining same-sex and opposite-sex friends, strangers, and romantic partners. Pain 158, 846–855 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Keogh, E., Cheng, F. & Wang, S. Exploring attentional biases towards facial expressions of pain in men and women. Eur. J. Pain 22, 1617–1627 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2000).

  • 62.

    Quigley, L., Wright, C. A., Dobson, K. S. & Sears, C. R. Measuring attentional control ability or beliefs? Evaluation of the factor structure and convergent validity of the attentional control scale. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 39, 742–754 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    McLellan, T. L., Wilcke, J. C., Johnston, L., Watts, R. & Miles, L. K. Sensitivity to posed and genuine displays of happiness and sadness: a fMRI study. Neurosci. Lett. 531, 149–154 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Gong, W., Fan, L. & Luo, F. Does experimentally induced pain affect attention? A meta-analytical review. J. Pain Res. 12, 585–595 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Berryman, C. et al. Do people with chronic pain have impaired executive function? A meta-analytical review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34, 563–579 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Taylor, C. T., Cross, K. & Amir, N. Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety symptoms and attentional disengagement from threatening information. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 50, 68–76 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Basanovic, J., Notebaert, L., Grafton, B., Hirsch, C. R. & Clarke, P. J. F. Attentional control predicts change in bias in response to attentional bias modification. Behav. Res. Ther. 99, 47–56 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Jones, E. B. & Sharpe, L. Cognitive bias modification: a review of meta-analyses. J. Affect. Disord. 223, 175–183 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Carleton, N. R., Richter, A. A. & Asmundson, G. J. G. Attention modification in persons with fibromyalgia: a double blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 40, 279–290 (2011).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Sharpe, L. et al. Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patients? Results of 2 randomised, controlled trials. Pain 153, 722–731 (2012).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Heathcote, L. C. et al. Attention bias modification training for adolescents with chronic pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Pain 159, 239–251 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Chen, N. T. M., Clarke, P. J. F., Watson, T. L., MacLeod, C. & Guastella, A. J. Attentional bias modification facilitates attentional control mechanisms: evidence from eye tracking. Biol. Psychol. 104, 139–146 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Heeren, A., Mogoaşe, C., McNally, R. J., Schmitz, A. & Philippot, P. Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder. J. Anxiety Disord. 29, 35–42 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Badura-Brack, A. S. et al. Effect of attention training on attention bias variability and PTSD symptoms: randomized controlled trials in Israeli and U.S. Combat Veterans. Am. J. Psychiatry 172, 1233–1241 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *