AbstractSmart streetlamps, which can automatically adjust luminance by sensing information about passing vehicles, are gradually becoming an integral part of smart cities. However, when choosing a matching scheme between intersection lighting and vehicle speed, the matching performance and traffic safety can be compromised if the traffic risks caused by various conflicting events are not fully considered. Because it is difficult for drivers to spot pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists at night, their accident mortality is relatively high. We designed conflicting events among pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, and vehicles, and addressed this problem in three stages. First, the reserved reaction time (RRT), corresponding to the moment when a driver applies brakes in response to an emergency, was used as a quantitative index of the nighttime risk at intersections. Second, we selected the most dangerous conflict event using RRT. Finally, under the most dangerous conflicting conditions, the optimal lighting and vehicle speed matching scheme was designed with minimum illumination as the optimization objective and considering an RRT greater than or equal to zero as the constraint. As the research object, we considered a two-way/two-lane and two-way/four-lane major–minor intersection. We then constructed an indoor simulation test platform based on the road and lighting parameters of the actual intersection, and validated the matching optimization method of intersection lighting and vehicle speed in the simulation environment. The results indicate that when the average road surface illuminance (ARSI) is less than 3.3 lx, a cyclist approaching an intersection from the right side is in the most hazardous situation. If the ARSI is greater than 3.3 lx, the most dangerous situation is a pedestrian approaching from the right side of an intersection.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *