CIVIL ENGINEERING 365 ALL ABOUT CIVIL ENGINEERING

[ad_1]

  • 1.

    Pitron, V. & de Vignemont, F. Beyond differences between the body schema and the body image: insights from body hallucinations. Conscious. Cogn. 53, 115–121 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Longo, M. R. & Haggard, P. Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 141, 164–168 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Hashimoto, T. & Iriki, A. Dissociations between the horizontal and dorsoventral axes in body-size perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 37, 1747–1753 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Longo, M. R. Implicit and explicit body representations. Eur. Psychol. 20, 6–15 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Linkenauger, S. A., Kirby, L. R., McCulloch, K. C. & Longo, M. R. People watching: The perception of the relative body proportions of the self and others. Cortex 92, 1–7 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Sadibolova, R., Ferrè, E. R., Linkenauger, S. A. & Longo, M. R. Distortions of perceived volume and length of body parts. Cortex 111, 74–86 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Maister, L., De Beukelaer, S., Longo, M. R. & Tsakiris, M. The Self in the Mind’s Eye: Reverse-correlating one’s self reveals how psychological beliefs and attitudes shape our body-image. PsyArXiv Prepr. (2020). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f2b36

  • 8.

    Kaplan, R. A., Rossell, S. L., Enticott, P. G. & Castle, D. J. Own-body perception in body dysmorphic disorder. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 18, 594–614 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Dakanalis, A. et al. Body-image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2, 16026 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Merle, A., Senecal, S. & St-Onge, A. Whether and how virtual try-on influences consumer responses to an apparel web site. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 16, 41–64 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Kim, J. & Forsythe, S. Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping. J. Interact. Mark. 22, 45–59 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Ducheneaut, N., Wen, M.-H., Yee, N. & Wadley, G. Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1151–1160 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518877

  • 13.

    Saarijärvi, H., Sutinen, U.-M. & Harris, L.C. Uncovering consumers’ returning behaviour: a study of fashion e-commerce. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 27, 284–299 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Petersen, J. A. & Kumar, V. Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. 73, 35–51 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Gallup, G. G. Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science. 167, 86LP-87LP (1970).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Fairhurst, M. T., Travers, E., Hayward, V. & Deroy, O. Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity. Sci. Rep. 8, 15604 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Rochat, P. & Zahavi, D. The uncanny mirror: A re-framing of mirror self-experience. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 204–213 (2011).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Longo, M. R., Coleman, R. & Tsakiris, M. The person in the mirror: using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 1725–1738 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    McKone, E., Crookes, K., Jeffery, L. & Dilks, D. D. A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 29, 174–212 (2012).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Schultz, R. T. Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 23, 125–141 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Yardley, L., McDermott, L., Pisarski, S., Duchaine, B. & Nakayama, K. Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: A problem of recognition. J. Psychosom. Res. 65, 445–451 (2008).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    McKone, E., Kanwisher, N. & Duchaine, B. C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends Cognit. Sci. 11, 8–15 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Apps, M. A. J., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Turley, G. & Tsakiris, M. The different faces of one’s self: an fMRI study into the recognition of current and past self-facial appearances. Neuroimage 63, 1720–1729 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Apps, M. A. J., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Sereno, M., Blanke, O. & Tsakiris, M. Plasticity in unimodal and multimodal brain areas reflects multisensory changes in self-face identification. Cereb. Cortex https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht199 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Gullberg, M. & Holmqvist, K. What speakers do and what addressees look at: Visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video. Pragmat. Cognit. 14, 53–82 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Doherty-Sneddon, G. et al. Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 3, 105–125 (1997).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    van Gog, T., Verveer, I. & Verveer, L. Learning from video modeling examples: Effects of seeing the human model’s face. Comput. Educ. 72, 323–327 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    McCloud, S. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art (HarperPerennial, New York, 1993).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Gulz, A. & Haake, M. Design of animated pedagogical agents—a look at their look. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 322–339 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Bleske-Rechek, A., Kolb, C. M., Stern, A. S., Quigley, K. & Nelson, L. A. Face and body: independent predictors of women’s attractiveness. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43, 1355–1365 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Jack, R. E. & Schyns, P. G. The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Curr. Biol. 25, R621–R634 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S. & Tanaka, J. The Body-Inversion Effect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 302–308 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Grubb, J. D. & McGoldrick, J. E. Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 73–87 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Tao, W. & Sun, H. Configural processing in body posture recognition: an eye-tracking study. Neuroreport 24, 903–910 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Thaler, A., Geuss, M. N. & Mohler, B. J. The role of visual information in body size estimation. Iperception. 9, 2041669518796853 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Cornelissen, P. L., Cornelissen, K. K., Groves, V., McCarty, K. & Tovée, M. J. View-dependent accuracy in body mass judgements of female bodies. Body Image 24, 116–123 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Thaler, A., Bülthoff, I., Pujades, S., Black, M. & Mohler, B. Is body size estimation viewpoint invariant?. J. Vis. 18, 165 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Misra, S. & Stokols, D. Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environ. Behav. 44, 737–759 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Sasaki, Y., Kawai, D. & Kitamura, S. The anatomy of tweet overload: How number of tweets received, number of friends, and egocentric network density affect perceived information overload. Telemat. Inform. 32, 853–861 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Parra, J. F. & Ruiz, S. Consideration sets in online shopping environments: the effects of search tool and information load. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 8, 252–262 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Lee, Z., Yi, Q. & Long, P. Is it the more the merrier? An exploratory study into the growing problem of information overload. J. Technol. Manag. China 6, 69–83 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Li, C.-Y. The more, the better? Why abundant information leads to unanticipated outcomes. Telemat. Inform. 33, 834–847 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Johnson, F., Cooke, L., Croker, H. & Wardle, J. Changing perceptions of weight in Great Britain: comparison of two population surveys. BMJ 337, a494 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Steinsbekk, S. et al. Body Size Estimation from Early to Middle Childhood: Stability of Underestimation, BMI, and Gender Effects. Front. Psychol. 8, 2038 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Robinson, E. & Kersbergen, I. Overweight or about right? A norm comparison explanation of perceived weight status. Obes. Sci. Pract. 3, 36–43 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Cazzato, V., Mian, E., Serino, A., Mele, S. & Urgesi, C. Distinct contributions of extrastriate body area and temporoparietal junction in perceiving one’s own and others’ body. Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 15, 211–228 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Ralph-Nearman, C. et al. A novel mobile tool (Somatomap) to assess body image perception pilot tested with fashion models and nonmodels: cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment. Health. 6, e14115 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Tovée, M. J., Benson, P. J., Emery, J. L., Mason, S. M. & Cohen-Tovée, E. M. Measurement of body size and shape perception in eating-disordered and control observers using body-shape software. Br. J. Psychol. 94, 501–516 (2003).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Monteath, S. A. & McCabe, M. P. The influence of societal factors on female body image. J. Soc. Psychol. 137, 708–727 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Spahlholz, J., Baer, N., König, H.-H., Riedel-Heller, S. G. & Luck-Sikorski, C. Obesity and discrimination—a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Obes. Rev. 17, 43–55 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Fikkan, J. L. & Rothblum, E. D. Is fat a feminist issue? Exploring the gendered nature of weight bias. Sex Roles 66, 575–592 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Pan, Y. & Steed, A. The impact of self-avatars on trust and collaboration in shared virtual environments. PLoS ONE 12, e0189078 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Jin, S.-A.A. “I feel more connected to the physically ideal mini me than the mirror-image mini me”: theoretical implications of the “malleable self” for speculations on the effects of avatar creation on avatar-self connection in wii. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13, 567–570 (2010).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Latoschik, M. E. et al. The effect of avatar realism in immersive social virtual realities. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139156

  • 55.

    Alemany, S. et al. Anthropometric survey of the Spanish female population aimed at the apparel industry. Int. Conf. 3D Body Scanning Technol. (2010).

  • 56.

    Voges, M. M. et al. Gender differences in body evaluation: do men show more self-serving double standards than women?. Front. Psychol. 10, 544 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Benet-Martínez, V. & John, O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 729–750 (1998).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, J. L., Navarro, J. G. & Grijalvo, F. The rosenberg self-esteem scale: translation and validation in university students. Span. J. Psychol. 10, 458–467 (2007).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Botella García del Cid, L., Ribas Rabert, E. & Ruiz, J. B. Evaluación Psicométrica de la Imagen Corporal Validación de la versión española del multidimensional body self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ). Rev. Argentina Clínica Psicológica XVIII, 253–264 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Grogan, S. Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children (Routledge, London, 2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2020).

  • 62.

    Lugrin, J., Wiedemann, M., Bieberstein, D. & Latoschik, M. E. Influence of avatar realism on stressful situation in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 227–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223378

  • 63.

    Schindler, S., Zell, E., Botsch, M. & Kissler, J. Differential effects of face-realism and emotion on event-related brain potentials and their implications for the uncanny valley theory. Sci. Rep. 7, 45003 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Lugrin, J., Latt, J. & Latoschik, M. E. Avatar anthropomorphism and illusion of body ownership in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 229–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223379

  • 65.

    Latoschik, M. E., Lugrin, J.-L. & Roth, D. FakeMi: a fake mirror system for avatar embodiment studies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 73–76 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993399

  • 66.

    Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F. & Kageki, N. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 98–100 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Zell, E. et al. To stylize or not to stylize? The effect of shape and material stylization on the perception of computer-generated faces. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 184 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N. & Rickertsen, K. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–10 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240626

  • 69.

    Neustaedter, C. & Fedorovskaya, E. Presenting identity in a virtual world through avatar appearances. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 183–190 (Canadian Information Processing Society, Mississauga, 2009).

  • 70.

    Kim, D.-E. & LaBat, K. Consumer experience in using 3D virtual garment simulation technology. J. Text. Inst. 104, 819–829 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 39–44 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Lischetzke, T., Izydorczyk, D., Hüller, C. & Appel, M. The topography of the uncanny valley and individuals’ need for structure: a nonlinear mixed effects analysis. J. Res. Pers. 68, 96–113 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Wuillemin, D. & Richardson, B. On the failure to recognize the back of One’s Own Hand. Perception 11, 53–55 (1982).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Bellard, A. M., Cornelissen, P. L., Mian, E. & Cazzato, V. The ageing body: contributing attitudinal factors towards perceptual body size estimates in younger and middle-aged women. Arch. Womens. Ment. Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01046-8 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 75.

    Thaler, A. et al. Perception of others’ body sizes is predicted by own body size. J. Vis. 17, 843 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Pujades, S. et al. The virtual caliper: rapid creation of metrically accurate avatars from 3D measurements. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 25, 1887–1897 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Thaler, A. et al. The influence of visual perspective on body size estimation in immersive virtual reality. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3343036.3343134

  • 78.

    Linkenauger, S. A., Ramenzoni, V. & Proffitt, D. R. Illusory shrinkage and growth: body-based rescaling affects the perception of size. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1318–1325 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Ogawa, N., Narumi, T. & Hirose, M. Distortion in perceived size and body-based scaling in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3041164.3041204

  • 80.

    Beilharz, F. L., Atkins, K. J., Duncum, A. J. F. & Mundy, M. E. Altering visual perception abnormalities: a marker for body image concern. PLoS ONE 11, e0151933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151933 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 81.

    Feusner, J. D. et al. Inverted face processing in body dysmorphic disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 44, 1088–1094 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    Winkler, C. & Rhodes, G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. Br. J. Psychol. 96, 141–154 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    Ambroziak, K. B., Azañón, E. & Longo, M. R. Body size adaptation alters perception of test stimuli, not internal body image. Front. Psychol. 10, 2598 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Mele, S., Cazzato, V. & Urgesi, C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS ONE 8, e81378 (2013).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 85.

    Cazzato, V. et al. The effects of body exposure on self-body image and esthetic appreciation in anorexia nervosa. Exp. Brain Res. 234, 695–709 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Tajadura-Jiménez, A. et al. As light as your footsteps: altering walking sounds to change perceived body weight, emotional state and gait. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2943–2952 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702374

  • 87.

    Irvine, K. R. et al. The visual cues that drive the self-assessment of body size: dissociation between fixation patterns and the key areas of the body for accurate judgement. Body Image 29, 31–46 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Cornelissen, K. K., McCarty, K., Cornelissen, P. L. & Tovée, M. J. Body size estimation in women with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls using 3D avatars. Sci. Rep. 7, 15773 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    Fairburn, C. G. & Beglin, S. J. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 16, 363–370 (1994).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 90.

    Garner, D. M. EDI-3, Eating Disorder Inventory-3: Professional Manual (Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated, 2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 91.

    JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.12.2)[Computer software]. (2020).

  • 92.

    Rammstedt, B. & John, O. P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers. 41, 203–212 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 93.

    Loper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G. & Black, M. J. SMPL: a skinned multi-person linear model. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 248 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 94.

    Schönberger, J. L. & Frahm, J. Structure-from-motion revisited. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 4104–4113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.445

  • 95.

    Schönberger, J. L., Zheng, E., Frahm, J.-M. & Pollefeys, M. Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. In Computer Vision—ECCV 2016 (eds Leibe, B. et al.) 501–518 (Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *