Pitron, V. & de Vignemont, F. Beyond differences between the body schema and the body image: insights from body hallucinations. Conscious. Cogn. 53, 115–121 (2017).
Longo, M. R. & Haggard, P. Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 141, 164–168 (2012).
Hashimoto, T. & Iriki, A. Dissociations between the horizontal and dorsoventral axes in body-size perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 37, 1747–1753 (2013).
Longo, M. R. Implicit and explicit body representations. Eur. Psychol. 20, 6–15 (2015).
Linkenauger, S. A., Kirby, L. R., McCulloch, K. C. & Longo, M. R. People watching: The perception of the relative body proportions of the self and others. Cortex 92, 1–7 (2017).
Sadibolova, R., Ferrè, E. R., Linkenauger, S. A. & Longo, M. R. Distortions of perceived volume and length of body parts. Cortex 111, 74–86 (2019).
Maister, L., De Beukelaer, S., Longo, M. R. & Tsakiris, M. The Self in the Mind’s Eye: Reverse-correlating one’s self reveals how psychological beliefs and attitudes shape our body-image. PsyArXiv Prepr. (2020). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f2b36
Kaplan, R. A., Rossell, S. L., Enticott, P. G. & Castle, D. J. Own-body perception in body dysmorphic disorder. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 18, 594–614 (2013).
Dakanalis, A. et al. Body-image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2, 16026 (2016).
Merle, A., Senecal, S. & St-Onge, A. Whether and how virtual try-on influences consumer responses to an apparel web site. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 16, 41–64 (2012).
Kim, J. & Forsythe, S. Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping. J. Interact. Mark. 22, 45–59 (2008).
Ducheneaut, N., Wen, M.-H., Yee, N. & Wadley, G. Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1151–1160 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518877
Saarijärvi, H., Sutinen, U.-M. & Harris, L.C. Uncovering consumers’ returning behaviour: a study of fashion e-commerce. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 27, 284–299 (2017).
Petersen, J. A. & Kumar, V. Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. 73, 35–51 (2009).
Gallup, G. G. Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science. 167, 86LP-87LP (1970).
Fairhurst, M. T., Travers, E., Hayward, V. & Deroy, O. Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity. Sci. Rep. 8, 15604 (2018).
Rochat, P. & Zahavi, D. The uncanny mirror: A re-framing of mirror self-experience. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 204–213 (2011).
Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Longo, M. R., Coleman, R. & Tsakiris, M. The person in the mirror: using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 1725–1738 (2012).
McKone, E., Crookes, K., Jeffery, L. & Dilks, D. D. A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 29, 174–212 (2012).
Schultz, R. T. Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 23, 125–141 (2005).
Yardley, L., McDermott, L., Pisarski, S., Duchaine, B. & Nakayama, K. Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: A problem of recognition. J. Psychosom. Res. 65, 445–451 (2008).
McKone, E., Kanwisher, N. & Duchaine, B. C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends Cognit. Sci. 11, 8–15 (2007).
Apps, M. A. J., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Turley, G. & Tsakiris, M. The different faces of one’s self: an fMRI study into the recognition of current and past self-facial appearances. Neuroimage 63, 1720–1729 (2012).
Apps, M. A. J., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Sereno, M., Blanke, O. & Tsakiris, M. Plasticity in unimodal and multimodal brain areas reflects multisensory changes in self-face identification. Cereb. Cortex https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht199 (2015).
Gullberg, M. & Holmqvist, K. What speakers do and what addressees look at: Visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video. Pragmat. Cognit. 14, 53–82 (2006).
Doherty-Sneddon, G. et al. Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 3, 105–125 (1997).
van Gog, T., Verveer, I. & Verveer, L. Learning from video modeling examples: Effects of seeing the human model’s face. Comput. Educ. 72, 323–327 (2014).
McCloud, S. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art (HarperPerennial, New York, 1993).
Gulz, A. & Haake, M. Design of animated pedagogical agents—a look at their look. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 322–339 (2006).
Bleske-Rechek, A., Kolb, C. M., Stern, A. S., Quigley, K. & Nelson, L. A. Face and body: independent predictors of women’s attractiveness. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43, 1355–1365 (2014).
Jack, R. E. & Schyns, P. G. The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Curr. Biol. 25, R621–R634 (2015).
Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S. & Tanaka, J. The Body-Inversion Effect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 302–308 (2003).
Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Grubb, J. D. & McGoldrick, J. E. Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 73–87 (2006).
Tao, W. & Sun, H. Configural processing in body posture recognition: an eye-tracking study. Neuroreport 24, 903–910 (2013).
Thaler, A., Geuss, M. N. & Mohler, B. J. The role of visual information in body size estimation. Iperception. 9, 2041669518796853 (2018).
Cornelissen, P. L., Cornelissen, K. K., Groves, V., McCarty, K. & Tovée, M. J. View-dependent accuracy in body mass judgements of female bodies. Body Image 24, 116–123 (2018).
Thaler, A., Bülthoff, I., Pujades, S., Black, M. & Mohler, B. Is body size estimation viewpoint invariant?. J. Vis. 18, 165 (2018).
Misra, S. & Stokols, D. Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environ. Behav. 44, 737–759 (2011).
Sasaki, Y., Kawai, D. & Kitamura, S. The anatomy of tweet overload: How number of tweets received, number of friends, and egocentric network density affect perceived information overload. Telemat. Inform. 32, 853–861 (2015).
Parra, J. F. & Ruiz, S. Consideration sets in online shopping environments: the effects of search tool and information load. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 8, 252–262 (2009).
Lee, Z., Yi, Q. & Long, P. Is it the more the merrier? An exploratory study into the growing problem of information overload. J. Technol. Manag. China 6, 69–83 (2011).
Li, C.-Y. The more, the better? Why abundant information leads to unanticipated outcomes. Telemat. Inform. 33, 834–847 (2016).
Johnson, F., Cooke, L., Croker, H. & Wardle, J. Changing perceptions of weight in Great Britain: comparison of two population surveys. BMJ 337, a494 (2008).
Steinsbekk, S. et al. Body Size Estimation from Early to Middle Childhood: Stability of Underestimation, BMI, and Gender Effects. Front. Psychol. 8, 2038 (2017).
Robinson, E. & Kersbergen, I. Overweight or about right? A norm comparison explanation of perceived weight status. Obes. Sci. Pract. 3, 36–43 (2017).
Cazzato, V., Mian, E., Serino, A., Mele, S. & Urgesi, C. Distinct contributions of extrastriate body area and temporoparietal junction in perceiving one’s own and others’ body. Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 15, 211–228 (2015).
Ralph-Nearman, C. et al. A novel mobile tool (Somatomap) to assess body image perception pilot tested with fashion models and nonmodels: cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment. Health. 6, e14115 (2019).
Tovée, M. J., Benson, P. J., Emery, J. L., Mason, S. M. & Cohen-Tovée, E. M. Measurement of body size and shape perception in eating-disordered and control observers using body-shape software. Br. J. Psychol. 94, 501–516 (2003).
Monteath, S. A. & McCabe, M. P. The influence of societal factors on female body image. J. Soc. Psychol. 137, 708–727 (1997).
Spahlholz, J., Baer, N., König, H.-H., Riedel-Heller, S. G. & Luck-Sikorski, C. Obesity and discrimination—a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Obes. Rev. 17, 43–55 (2016).
Fikkan, J. L. & Rothblum, E. D. Is fat a feminist issue? Exploring the gendered nature of weight bias. Sex Roles 66, 575–592 (2012).
Pan, Y. & Steed, A. The impact of self-avatars on trust and collaboration in shared virtual environments. PLoS ONE 12, e0189078 (2017).
Jin, S.-A.A. “I feel more connected to the physically ideal mini me than the mirror-image mini me”: theoretical implications of the “malleable self” for speculations on the effects of avatar creation on avatar-self connection in wii. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13, 567–570 (2010).
Latoschik, M. E. et al. The effect of avatar realism in immersive social virtual realities. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139156
Alemany, S. et al. Anthropometric survey of the Spanish female population aimed at the apparel industry. Int. Conf. 3D Body Scanning Technol. (2010).
Voges, M. M. et al. Gender differences in body evaluation: do men show more self-serving double standards than women?. Front. Psychol. 10, 544 (2019).
Benet-Martínez, V. & John, O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 729–750 (1998).
Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, J. L., Navarro, J. G. & Grijalvo, F. The rosenberg self-esteem scale: translation and validation in university students. Span. J. Psychol. 10, 458–467 (2007).
Botella García del Cid, L., Ribas Rabert, E. & Ruiz, J. B. Evaluación Psicométrica de la Imagen Corporal Validación de la versión española del multidimensional body self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ). Rev. Argentina Clínica Psicológica XVIII, 253–264 (2009).
Grogan, S. Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children (Routledge, London, 2017).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2020).
Lugrin, J., Wiedemann, M., Bieberstein, D. & Latoschik, M. E. Influence of avatar realism on stressful situation in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 227–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223378
Schindler, S., Zell, E., Botsch, M. & Kissler, J. Differential effects of face-realism and emotion on event-related brain potentials and their implications for the uncanny valley theory. Sci. Rep. 7, 45003 (2017).
Lugrin, J., Latt, J. & Latoschik, M. E. Avatar anthropomorphism and illusion of body ownership in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 229–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223379
Latoschik, M. E., Lugrin, J.-L. & Roth, D. FakeMi: a fake mirror system for avatar embodiment studies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 73–76 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993399
Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F. & Kageki, N. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 98–100 (2012).
Zell, E. et al. To stylize or not to stylize? The effect of shape and material stylization on the perception of computer-generated faces. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 184 (2015).
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N. & Rickertsen, K. A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–10 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240626
Neustaedter, C. & Fedorovskaya, E. Presenting identity in a virtual world through avatar appearances. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 183–190 (Canadian Information Processing Society, Mississauga, 2009).
Kim, D.-E. & LaBat, K. Consumer experience in using 3D virtual garment simulation technology. J. Text. Inst. 104, 819–829 (2013).
Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 39–44 (2001).
Lischetzke, T., Izydorczyk, D., Hüller, C. & Appel, M. The topography of the uncanny valley and individuals’ need for structure: a nonlinear mixed effects analysis. J. Res. Pers. 68, 96–113 (2017).
Wuillemin, D. & Richardson, B. On the failure to recognize the back of One’s Own Hand. Perception 11, 53–55 (1982).
Bellard, A. M., Cornelissen, P. L., Mian, E. & Cazzato, V. The ageing body: contributing attitudinal factors towards perceptual body size estimates in younger and middle-aged women. Arch. Womens. Ment. Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01046-8 (2020).
Thaler, A. et al. Perception of others’ body sizes is predicted by own body size. J. Vis. 17, 843 (2017).
Pujades, S. et al. The virtual caliper: rapid creation of metrically accurate avatars from 3D measurements. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 25, 1887–1897 (2019).
Thaler, A. et al. The influence of visual perspective on body size estimation in immersive virtual reality. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3343036.3343134
Linkenauger, S. A., Ramenzoni, V. & Proffitt, D. R. Illusory shrinkage and growth: body-based rescaling affects the perception of size. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1318–1325 (2010).
Ogawa, N., Narumi, T. & Hirose, M. Distortion in perceived size and body-based scaling in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3041164.3041204
Beilharz, F. L., Atkins, K. J., Duncum, A. J. F. & Mundy, M. E. Altering visual perception abnormalities: a marker for body image concern. PLoS ONE 11, e0151933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151933 (2016).
Feusner, J. D. et al. Inverted face processing in body dysmorphic disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 44, 1088–1094 (2010).
Winkler, C. & Rhodes, G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. Br. J. Psychol. 96, 141–154 (2005).
Ambroziak, K. B., Azañón, E. & Longo, M. R. Body size adaptation alters perception of test stimuli, not internal body image. Front. Psychol. 10, 2598 (2019).
Mele, S., Cazzato, V. & Urgesi, C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS ONE 8, e81378 (2013).
Cazzato, V. et al. The effects of body exposure on self-body image and esthetic appreciation in anorexia nervosa. Exp. Brain Res. 234, 695–709 (2016).
Tajadura-Jiménez, A. et al. As light as your footsteps: altering walking sounds to change perceived body weight, emotional state and gait. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2943–2952 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702374
Irvine, K. R. et al. The visual cues that drive the self-assessment of body size: dissociation between fixation patterns and the key areas of the body for accurate judgement. Body Image 29, 31–46 (2019).
Cornelissen, K. K., McCarty, K., Cornelissen, P. L. & Tovée, M. J. Body size estimation in women with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls using 3D avatars. Sci. Rep. 7, 15773 (2017).
Fairburn, C. G. & Beglin, S. J. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 16, 363–370 (1994).
Garner, D. M. EDI-3, Eating Disorder Inventory-3: Professional Manual (Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated, 2004).
JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.12.2)[Computer software]. (2020).
Rammstedt, B. & John, O. P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers. 41, 203–212 (2007).
Loper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G. & Black, M. J. SMPL: a skinned multi-person linear model. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 248 (2015).
Schönberger, J. L. & Frahm, J. Structure-from-motion revisited. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 4104–4113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.445
Schönberger, J. L., Zheng, E., Frahm, J.-M. & Pollefeys, M. Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. In Computer Vision—ECCV 2016 (eds Leibe, B. et al.) 501–518 (Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 2016).