# Synergetic enhancement in the reactivity and stability of surface-oxide-free fine Al particles covered with a polytetrafluoroethylene nanolayer

Sep 3, 2020

### Preparation and microstructure of PTFE coated fine Al particles

Figure 1a shows the synthetic process of Al particles densely covered with PTFE materials via chemical routes using suspended PTFE nanoparticles. First, the surface oxide layer on the Al particles is decomposed into AlF3 and H2O by the addition of a hydrofluoric acid (HF) solution, expressed as the following reaction (1).

$${text{Al}}_{{2}} {text{O}}_{{3}} {text{(s)}} + {text{6HF(aq)}} to {text{2AlF}}_{{3}} {text{(aq)}} + {text{3H}}_{{2}} {text{O(l)}}$$

(1)

Once the oxide layer was removed, the fluorine attached to PTFE and isolated from HF initially adsorbed onto the exposed pure Al surface. Because F atoms have the highest electronegativity for Al compared to other elements such as oxygen, the surface must be preferentially covered by fluorine-based materials. Some AlF3 produced during this process was simultaneously dissolved and hydrated due to its high solubility in an aqueous solution. The as-formed PTFE layer may not be fully densified due to the free volume caused by the remaining solvent among the nanoparticles. Therefore, the prepared PTFE/Al powder was heated to produce a densely packed coating layer. Figure 1b shows surface SEM images and EDS results of the synthesized PTFE/Al particles. In spite of the etching process, the size of the Al particles of approximately 5 µm is mostly unchanged. The distributions of the F and C atoms shown in the EDS results of the coated Al particles indicate that the PTFE materials are clearly coated, covering the surfaces of the particles. Figure 1c, which compares the FT-IR spectra of the PTFE/Al particles and PTFE molecules, clearly indicates that their peaks in the 800–1,300 cm−1 region are in good agreement with those of aliphatic fluorinated compounds33,34. The peaks at 1,273 cm−1 and 1,194 cm−1 indicate typical –CF2– functional group stretching of the PTFE. Other FT-IR peaks of the PTFE/Al particles were found at 3,675, 3,415 and 1604 cm−1; these can be attributed to the formation of Al–OH stretching, hydrogen-bonded OH stretching by intramolecular motion and OH deformation vibration, respectively. These results show that the PTFE materials were spontaneously adsorbed onto the surface of the Al by surface fluoridation.

Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional FE-TEM image of a PTFE/Al particle produced by a focused ion beam (FIB). The measured thickness of the PTFE layer is approximately 100 nm. The selected-area electric diffraction (SAED) pattern of the PTFE layer indicates a polycrystalline structure composed of many nano-sized PTFE chains. In general, organic polymers show high permeability to oxygen and water molecules due to their chain structure compared to an inorganic Al2O3 layer35. An increase in the thickness of the coating layer considering the permeability of moisture or oxygen is considered to be an effective means of achieving stability matching that of passivated Al2O3 film thinner than 5 nm. Therefore, it has been suggested that the thickness of PTFE as a coating layer should be at least 100 nm to maintain the surface of the pure Al consistently. This value is based on our previous results with polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)/Al particles22. Figure 2b shows a TEM image of the PTFE/Al interface, showing an absence of oxide materials. As shown in the enlarged TEM image in Fig. 2c, the coating layer near the interface consists of coiled PTFE chains 10 nm in size, also without an oxide layer between the Al and the PTFE. The EDS results in Fig. 2d present the distributions of carbon, fluorine, oxygen, and Al atoms in the particles. The PTFE coating is clearly confirmed by the dense C and F atomic layers on the Al particles. Some oxygen atoms present within the PTFE layer are from the Al–OH formation step during the etching process.

### Exothermic reactivity of uncoated Al and PTFE/Al powders

Figure 3a,b show the thermal analysis results of the uncoated Al powder and the PTFE/Al powder between 298 and 1,473 K. The PTFE/Al powder was shown to be stable at room temperature, but there was a weight reduction of approximately 3% from the temperature of approximately 620 K due to thermal decomposition. Surface oxidation of the uncoated Al and PTFE/Al powders occurred at 873 K and 923 K, respectively. The main oxidation step, which occurs at temperatures exceeding 1,100 K, proceeded more rapidly for the PTFE/Al powder than for the Al powder. In the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve shown in Fig. 3b, the uncoated Al powder clearly show an exothermic peak due to surface oxidation at 860 K and an endothermic peak at 933 K due to melting. Conversely, the PTFE/Al powder was found to undergo somewhat delayed surface oxidation owing to the relatively thick PTFE layer. The wide peaks of both powders observed in the range of 1,050–1,350 K were caused by the main oxidation of the internal Al, which is in a molten state in this range.

In Fig. 3c, the quantitative weight and exothermic enthalpy of Al and PVDF/Al from the TGA/DSC profiles are compared. The PVDF/Al data from our previous research is included for a comparison with the PTFE/Al powder under identical conditions. The weight of Al increased by 140%, and the exothermic enthalpy in the temperature range of 1,023 K to 1,473 K was found to be 4.85 kJ g −1. In addition, the PTFE/Al powder shows an improved weight gain of 167%, and the enthalpy was determined to be 12.26 kJ g−1. These values are somewhat higher than those of a previously synthesized PVDF/Al powder22 (see Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Information), as the number of F atoms in PTFE present during the pyrolysis process exceeds that associated with PVDF (–(CH2–CF2)n–). Specifically, the formation of many fluorine compounds in PTFE is beneficial as it synergistically provides enhanced reactivity to the oxidation processes occurring on the Al surface because complex surface reactions such as the formation of the AlF3 phase will inevitably occur at the PTFE/Al interface compared to those with the Al2O3–passivated Al powder. The theoretical enthalpy is 28.96 kJ g−1 at 1,273 K (details of Equation S1 in the Supplementary Information), and this value was utilized in the comparison of the results of the uncoated Al and PTFE/Al powders.

The PTFE/Al powder was heat-treated at temperatures of 873 K and 1,173 K in an air atmosphere in order to confirm the complex reactions caused by the fluorine atoms. Figure 4a,b compare the XRD patterns and SEM images of the PTFE/Al powder with three different heat treatment temperatures of 298 K, 873 K and 1,173 K. Figure 4c is a schematic of the fluorine compounds and the reaction occurring on the surfaces of the Al particle in each temperature section. The XRD pattern at 298 K indicates that the main peaks of the PTFE/Al powder, except for aluminum, correspond to AlF1.5(OH)1.5(H2O)0.375. The heat-treated PTFE/Al powder at 873 K show peaks at 2θ = 15.8°, 30.4°, and 31.8°, indicating the formation of AlF1.5(OH)1.5, and the additional peaks observed at 2θ = 14.8°, 25.0° and 29.7° represent the formation of β-AlF336,37. This outcomes demonstrate that aluminum fluoride initially forms before the aluminum oxide does according to the stronger bonding capabilities of Al-F (664 kJ mol−1) compared to those of Al–O (512 kJ mol−1)31. A lint-like deformed surface of the PTFE/Al particles was observed in the SEM images at 873 K. At 1,173 K, where the bulk of oxidation takes place, only patterns of aluminum and Al2O3 phases were identified, with broken Al particle fragments also observed. These results show that the particle shell can easily be broken by the thermal expansion of molten aluminum due to fluorine compounds which form on the surface, as we reported earlier paper. Thus, the reactivity of fine Al particles can be enhanced via the direct coating with PTFE materials.

### Stability and reactivity of PTFE/Al powder

Furthermore, the stability of the synthesized PTFE/Al powder was characterized by aging tests and an electrochemical analysis. As shown in Fig. 5a, the PTFE/Al powder was classified into two experimental groups, one stored under air and the other in an argon atmosphere. The uncoated Al powder with a dense oxide film underwent no change in the enthalpy value for more than 24 months (see Fig. S2 for details). Similarly, the PTFE/Al powder stored in an argon atmosphere also exhibited a very stable enthalpy value during the test period. Regarding the PTFE/Al powder stored in air, although the enthalpy value decreased slightly to 10.71 kJ g−1 after 24 months, it is difficult to postulate that the performance clearly deteriorated because this sample did not show a great difference from the experimental tolerance range (12.26 ± 0.98 kJ g−1). Therefore, we conducted an artificial accelerated aging test under extreme conditions. The accelerated aging test was performed for two weeks at 333 K under a relative humidity of 75%, as shown in Fig. 5b. For both the uncoated Al and the PTFE/Al powders, the enthalpy value tended to decrease after three days, with the corresponding values reduced to 3.09 kJ g−1 and 8.21 kJ g−1, after 14 days (see Fig. S3). When both conditions of natural aging and accelerated aging are converted to the mole fraction of water by a psychrometric calculator, the outcomes are approximately 0.01 and 0.15, respectively. The respective absolute humidity levels are 10,000 ppm and 150,000 ppm, indicating that the accelerated aging test was conducted in a very humid atmosphere of approximately 15 times higher compared to that of the natural aging test. In other words, re-passivation can proceed at a certain threshold of moisture even if PTFE is densely coated onto the Al particles. Nevertheless, the fact that the PTFE/Al powder has an exothermic enthalpy value more than twice that of the uncoated Al powder indicates that the PTFE/Al interface and the coating layer are stably maintained without any severe passivation by oxygen.

As shown in Fig. 5c, the measured corrosion potentials (Ecorr) of the uncoated Al and the PTFE/Al powders are − 0.415 V and − 0.290 V, respectively. Because this is a potential at which electrons are emitted from the surface of the material, it is interpreted that more activation energy is required to oxidize the PTFE/Al powder compared to the uncoated Al powder. The corrosion current (Icorr) induced by the Tafel extrapolation method showed that the PTFE/Al powder has a value of 0.079 µAcm−2, higher than that of the uncoated Al powder of 0.074 µA cm−2 (see Fig. S4). In the cyclic voltammetry assessment, the inflection point of the anode curve peak represents the potential at which oxidation occurs at the working electrode. As shown in Fig. 5d, the measured peak potentials of the anode curve (Epa) are − 0.45 V for uncoated Al and − 0.39 V for the PTFE/Al powders. These results clarify that the activation energy for the oxidation of the PTFE/Al powder is higher than of the uncoated Al powder.

The reactivity and stability for the oxidation of both PTFE/Al and uncoated Al particles can be summarized by a conceptual illustration using the activation energy and Boltzmann distribution curves, as shown in Fig. 5e. The higher activation energy peak means that the PTFE layer introduced in this study provides superior stability against a sudden explosion of Al particles compared to the surface oxide layer of Al2O3. As shown in the comparison of the Boltzmann curves, the large surface area of pure Al under the PTFE layer provides numerous reaction sites for oxygen molecules, resulting in a high exothermic enthalpy energy release at an elevated temperature beyond the activation energy. Additionally, it should be noted that the activation energy of both powders can change after surface oxidation. Such a prediction of the change in the activation energy is plotted in Supplementary Figure S5 using the Arrhenius equation.